The ‘accelerating Universe’ has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong

Because Hubble’s law has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong
------------------------------------------------ by Bingcheng Zhao

Related knowledge: ‘accelerating Universe’ refers to the expansion of the Universe appears to be accelerating, and the basis of ‘accelerating Universe’ is Hubble’s law.

Core reminding!!! Fact 1: Hubble’s law has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 735 ~ 751, Ch.6B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz78.blogspot.com/ ). Fact 2: the ‘expanding Universe’ has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 761 ~ 766, 7.2, Ch.7A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz79.blogspot.com/ ). Fact 3: general relativity has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 399 ~ 444, Ch.4A, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz74.blogspot.com/ ). Fact 4: Big Bang theory has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 766 ~ 772, 7.3.1, Ch.7A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz80.blogspot.com/ ). These four proven facts will be tangibly helpful to digesting and accepting another proven fact: ‘accelerating Universe’ has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong ---- the central topic of 7.5, Ch.7B (P. 782, 7.5, Ch.7B, reference #2).

[*Acronym: EPBGR = Einstein’s postulate-based general relativity (i.e., general relativity) ---- note, Einstein’s general relativity is based on a series of assumptions and postulates (e.g., the postulate of equivalence principle), so its real name should be Einstein’s postulate-based general relativity].


Proving ‘accelerating Universe’ is mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 782, 7.5, Ch.7B, reference #2), i.e., the claimed ‘accelerating Universe’ does not and cannot exist at all, being sufficiently evidenced from either of the two routes. Route 1: because ‘accelerating Universe’ is the interpretation of the observational results via Hubble’s law, whereas Hubble’s law has been proven to be mechanistically (thus essentially) and mathematically wrong (P. 735 ~ 751, Ch.6B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz78.blogspot.com/ ), the claimed ‘accelerating Universe’ is mechanistically thus essentially wrong accordingly, i.e., the claimed ‘accelerating Universe’ does not and cannot exist at all. Route 2: because the so-called ‘expanding Universe’ has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 761 ~ 766, 7.2, Ch.7A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz79.blogspot.com/ ), the claimed ‘accelerating Universe’ is mechanistically thus essentially wrong accordingly, since the validity of ‘accelerating Universe’ is completely dependent on the validity of ‘expanding Universe’ ---- the prerequisite of valid ‘accelerating Universe’ is the validity of ‘expanding Universe’. In other words, after the so-called ‘expanding Universe’ has been proven does not and cannot exist at all, the claimed ‘accelerating Universe’ does not and cannot exist accordingly, because the ‘accelerating Universe’ is completely attached onto the ‘expanding Universe’.


The key to understanding of the proven fact that ‘accelerating Universe’ is mechanistically thus essentially wrong: (1) knowing of the proven fact that Hubble’s law has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 735 ~ 751, Ch.6B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz78.blogspot.com/ ), simply because Hubble’s law is the basis of ‘accelerating Universe’. (2) The key to understanding of the proven fact that Hubble’s law is mechanistically and mathematically wrong is the proven fact that Doppler effect for light has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 722 ~ 732, 6.7, Ch.6A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz77.blogspot.com/ ), because the recessional velocity of stars thus galaxies in Hubble’s law is determined with Doppler effect for light. (3) Knowing of the proven fact that general relativity (i.e., EPBGR) has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 399 ~ 444, Ch.4A, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz74.blogspot.com/ ), because the ‘accelerating Universe’ is related to the cosmological constant embedded in EPBGR. (4) Knowing of the well-known and undeniable fact: modern physics does not and cannot solve the fundamentally important problem of why time and space are variable thus relative in gravitational field, because the so-called ‘accelerating Universe’ is ultimately the product of modern physics unable to know why time and space are variable thus relative in gravitational field. (5) The newly revealed mechanism behind universal gravitational constant G, which is that the value of G is and represents the reduction in the scales of space and time occurring in gravitational field (P. 505 ~ 509, 4.16, Ch.4B, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz26.blogspot.com/ ), will be concretely helpful to understanding of the proven fact that ‘accelerating Universe’ is mechanistically thus essentially wrong, because a theoretical root of ‘accelerating Universe’ is EPBGR’s postulate of ‘invariant scales of length (space) and time’, whereas this postulate has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 419 ~ 426, 4.5, Ch.4A, reference #1).

Two crucial clues substantially helpful to understanding of the proven fact that ‘accelerating Universe’ is mechanistically thus essentially wrong: (1) ‘accelerating Universe’ is related to the hypothesized dark energy. However, the problem of dark energy is factually a permanently incapable solved fundamentally important problem within the paradigm of postulate-based modern physics. Related information: the problem of dark energy has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 783 ~ 786, 7.6, Ch.7B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz35.blogspot.com/ ). (2) ‘Accelerating Universe’ is related to the cosmological constant embedded in EPBGR. However, the problem of cosmological constant is actually a permanently incapable solved fundamentally important problem within the paradigm of postulate-based modern physics. Related information: The problem of cosmological constant has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 786 ~ 794, 7.7, Ch.7B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz36.blogspot.com/ ).

The mechanistically thus essentially profound implications of ‘accelerating Universe’ turns out to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong: (1) any so-called observational evidences of ‘accelerating Universe’ cannot be mechanistically thus essentially valid, simply because ‘accelerating Universe’ utterly skips over the mechanism thus essence behind its describing phenomena, as the consequence that Hubble’s law has been proven utterly skipping over the mechanism thus essence behind its describing phenomena. (2) Any so-called interpretations of ‘accelerating Universe’ cannot be mechanistically thus essentially correct, because this sort of interpretations turns out to be merely the consequence of mechanistically thus essentially mistakenly interpreting observational results with Hubble’s law.

The catastrophic consequences of not accepting the proven fact that ‘accelerating Universe’ is mechanistically thus essentially wrong: (1) modern astronomy and cosmology will continue to be built upon the mechanistically and mathematically wrong foundation and paradigm of ‘accelerating Universe’. (2) It is impossible to establish and accept mechanistically thus essentially correct concept of time and space in the universe. Related Q-and-A, Q: what is the mechanistically thus essentially correct concept of time and space in the universe? A: the newly established and verified Mechanism-Revealed Gravitational Theory tells that (P. 445 ~ 514, Ch.4B, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz20.blogspot.com/ ).

12 pieces of related information: (1) Hubble’s law has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 735 ~ 751, Ch.6B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz78.blogspot.com/ ). (2) The ‘expanding Universe’ has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 761 ~ 766, 7.2, Ch.7A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz79.blogspot.com/ ). (3) General relativity has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 399 ~ 444, Ch.4A, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz74.blogspot.com/ ). (4) Big Bang theory has been proven to be mechanistically thus essentially wrong (P. 766 ~ 772, 7.3.1, Ch.7A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz80.blogspot.com/ ). (5) The problem of dark energy has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 783 ~ 786, 7.6, Ch.7B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz35.blogspot.com/ ). (6) The problem of cosmological constant has been completely solved, with the newly established and verified mechanism-revealed physics (P. 786 ~ 794, 7.7, Ch.7B, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz36.blogspot.com/ ). (7) Establishing and Verifying Mechanism-Revealed Gravitational Theory (P. 445 ~ 514, Ch.4B, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz20.blogspot.com/ ). (8) Revealing the mechanism behind universal gravitational constant G (P. 505 ~ 509, 4.16, Ch.4B, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz26.blogspot.com/ ). (9) Discovering the principle of Mechanism-Revealed Redshift and Blueshift of Light (P. 714 ~ 722, 6.5 and 6.6, Ch.6A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz34.blogspot.com/ ). (10) Doppler effect for light has been proven to be mechanistically and mathematically wrong (P. 722 ~ 732, 6.7, Ch.6A, reference #2; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz77.blogspot.com/ ). (11) The law of object’s mass doing work (P. 93 ~ 109, Ch.1A, reference #1; http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz1.blogspot.com/ ). (12) Mechanism-Revealed Physics, Bingcheng Zhao (http://mechanism-revealedphysics-bcz71.blogspot.com/ ).


Reference #1: 2009, Bingcheng Zhao, From Postulate-Based Modern Physics to Mechanism-Revealed Physics [Vol. 1(1/2)], ISBN: 978-1-4357-4913-9.
Reference #2: 2009, Bingcheng Zhao, From Postulate-Based Modern Physics to Mechanism-Revealed Physics [Vol. 2(2/2)], ISBN: 978-1-4357-5033-3.

Ph.D., Bingcheng Zhao,
The author of “From Postulate-Based Modern Physics to Mechanism-Revealed Physics”
1401 NE Merman Dr. Apt. 703, Pullman, WA 99163 USA.
Email: bingcheng.zhao@gmail.com